Recruiting sales people is one of the most difficult
of all sales management tasks. Whether you are a business owner, human
resource manager, sales manager or a recruitment agent you have tales of
how you hired a seemingly great candidate who never performed. Many of
us blame the candidate for deceiving us and will rarely take the
responsibility of having erred in the choice we made.
But for every bad sales person you hired, you are
likely to have overlooked a great one who would have delivered the
results you badly wanted. If you think you are alone in this, you are
wrong. Every day organizations are finding themselves in this same
situation. This may be consoling , but my intention is not to suit you,
but to highlight some of the mistakes made in the process of hiring
sales people.
Conventional Recruitment
Hiring sales people is not same as hiring other
employees. Unfortunately, many employers follow the same script for
hiring sales people as for hiring accountants, receptionists,
technicians, etc. The conventional method of selecting employment
candidates relies on the attractiveness of resume, academic
qualifications, work experience and performance in the interviewing
session.
Although experience has shown that these factors
cannot predict a candidate’s performance in a sales position many
managers continue to rely on them for lack of an alternative. Others
have given up on ever being able to pick a good candidate from a bad
one. That may be the reason why many managers have concluded that hiring
is a numbers game. They believe that you improve your chances of
getting a good sales person by hiring anyone and everyone who comes your
way and natural selection will get yet rid of the bad ones and you are
left with the right ones.
This may seem a logical solution, but only if you
don’t consider the cost of making the wrong hire. Think of the time and
financial investments you have to make before the natural selection
process is over.
You need to come up with an alternative to the conventional hiring approaches.
Alternative Approach
The first step in this alternative is a definition of
an ideal candidate that goes beyond the conventional candidate
profiling. The qualities that you need to look for in an ideal candidate
should be specific to your organization. For a firm that has been in
business for a while, you can define an ideal candidate as one who has
attributes matching those that the best salesperson you have ever hired
had. These qualities include mental, social, physical and behavioral
traits. Once you have compiled these attributes you have a candidate
selection criteria. You would want the candidate to poses most of these
traits before you consider hiring them.
You need also to define the qualities of a bad hire.
Look at all the bad hires you made and identify the qualities that they
have in common. This will help you not make the same mistake again.
The next step is developing a methodology that you
will use to select a candidate who matches this criterion. Most of the
qualities that define the ideal candidate cannot be singled out in a
fifteen minute oral interview whether by one interviewer or several. You
need to have a rigorous process that you take the candidates through to
judge whether the candidate possesses the qualities you are looking
for. Some of these qualities can be evaluated through observation,
others by asking questions, others through specialized testing tools
while some can only be picked from working with the candidate. But make
sure you don’t overlook any attribute that is critical to sales
performance.
Hire when it is not too late
In traditional recruitment the process of filling a
position starts when the position becomes vacant or is about to. In
sales that is too late. Most bad hiring decisions are made when you have
to hire. The best time to meet a sales candidate is when you don’t have
to fill a position. That is the time you will be more objective in the
decision you make and there is no pressure to pick a candidate you have
doubts about.
Too much too soon is not a strategy
Many employers make the assumption that once they hire
a candidate the person should start to produce immediately with minimal
support. When you hire on basis of experience you are more likely to
make this assumption. However, every salesperson regardless of their
work experience will take time to settle in a new environment, develop a
pipeline and build relationships with customers.
Once you hire when you have too you also tend to
expect too much too soon from your new sales person. When you do this
you put the person under much pressure without developing and equipping
them to produce. To address this challenge you need to have a structured
on-boarding programme for new sales people that will ensure the people
are well prepared to produce but also places realistic performance
milestones in the new people.
Poaching: Hiring the tried and proven to be useless
In most positions you are better of hiring people who
have been proven in your industry. In sales this is not necessarily
good. Hiring from competition seems to be the easiest solution to the
sales recruitment difficulties you experience as it is often the easiest
solution to problem is the wrong solution.
‘Poaching’ from competition is based on two
assumptions. The first one is that your competition is better at hiring
and developing their sales people. The second is that you are better
placed to attract the best talent from your competition.
These assumptions are wrong on two grounds. First your
competitors are not necessarily better at identifying great sales
talent and secondly once they do they are unlikely to let it go easily.
Then you need to accept that no employer will let go their best sales
people without a fight. This means that the people you get from the
competition are likely to be the ones that their past employers were
happy to let go. My advice to most organizations is that they either
hire fresh people or from other industries. The laziness to develop your
own talent is a cancer that is hurting too many sales organizations
that expect to get miracle workers developed by others.
If you are in doubt of your capacity to adopt a hiring
approach then you need to engage the professionals who have the
expertise and tools to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment